Yet, Mach3 supports many controller types, including GRBL. I understand that Mach3 based are configured for optimal control by Mach3 as a software controller, and in some cases are able to use pendants with Mach3. Similarly The so called Mach3 controllers are slaves. I have read that GRBL, for the most part is like M2 on the laser side, being a slave.
I see on the CNC side there is GRBL, GRBL-LCP, GRBL-DSP, GRBL1.1, and Mach3. Ruida was described as closed source all in one stand alone complete with image processing and gcode extrapolation. I have read a post conversation by the Admin where M2 was described as little more than a direct slave. What else is there? I would like to expand this. Save for those of us jumping in the deep end having no idea what is going on… I have done a lot of digging, found some good information, but need to tie it all together now.
What I have not found is any sort of chart that makes easy comparison, as if every one already knew all there was to know. Some specialized, and some closed source.
0 kommentar(er)
